Watchmen is a graphic novel that has been placed on such a high pedestal, that I have been nervous about tackling it, feeling I wasn’t ready for it. But with this ongoing quarantine, I felt it was the right time for me to take the time to read it. I paired it with Watchmen: The Complete Motion Comic movie that added limited motion, voice and sound to the originally drawn panels. I took almost a week to watch two chapters a night, and I would read the pages alongside the animation on the screen.
Let’s just get this over with- I did not like the story. But is that the point? I have actually picked up this graphic novel several times in the past but would put it down, thinking that it wasn’t the right time for me to read this acclaimed novel by the supposedly brilliant Alan Moore. It’s one of those books, that you feel if you don’t get it, then you aren’t deep enough to understand it and will feel guilty. However, it did include some heavy themes I have been thinking on a lot, and that is always a sign of a well-written novel.
Set in an alternative timeline to ours, a few key historical events have changed, leading to a 1980s NYC that is very similar to ours but is just enough different. A former superhero, The Comedian, now a government-sanctioned agent, is found murdered. Rorschach, a vigilante who never quit despite a national law that outlawed costumed adventuring, becomes the narrator of the story as he picks up clues that point to a larger conspiracy. He visits all his former comrades to warn them that they may be in danger; and soon Nite Owl, the second Silk Spectre, Dr. Manhatten and Ozymandias are part of a greater plot to bring about world peace at a great cost. The ideas of what makes a hero are explored, as they all are anti-heroes, and no one is blameless.
Divided into twelve chapters, I found chapter four to be the most intriguing, as Dr. Manhatten recalls his history in a non-linear format of how an accident with an atom reactor in 1959 changed him from a brilliant scientist into the only true superhero of the bunch. Between the chapters were additional backstory inserts that were supposed to be giving readers more insight into the Watchmen world. Some of the supplemental info is presented like reports and articles about the characters’ past and present. Some were more effective than others. A comic book story within a comic book story, the story Marooned from Tales of the Black Freighter, was entwined into the narrative, and at first paralleled the story of being lost and mentally unstable but then became pretentious and unneeded.
I believe what unhinged the story for me were the main characters. They were so unlikable, morally bankrupt and idiotic. I might have been at a disadvantage listening to the motion comic voiced by a man, but Laurie and her mother Sally were just the most petulant and shallow people ever. Moore at no time gave his women characters nuanced or authentic development. I’m sorry, but what Sally agreed to later with The Comedian was stomach-churning after what he had done to her years before, and that Dr. Manhatten’s decision to help Earth was based off that decision was shocking. I get that the characters were supposed to be a deconstruction of what we have come to expect in heroes, that was the whole premise of the book, but when you weren’t rooting for anyone, it becomes problematic.
The art was a mixed bag for me. Every page has a nine-panel layout, with only a few of the panels being enlarged. While a rather straightforward style, it allowed the artist Dave Gibbons to control the pace of the story. The cast of characters that he designed were an interesting lot, he didn’t draw them in a superlative style that we have come to expect from superheroes. The costumes looked homemade and their bodies were realistically proportioned, with Dr. Manhatten being the exception. The coloring by John Higgins was at times surreal, with deep shadows and a psychedelic color palette. All told it made for a distinctive, but not entirely attractive look.
Although I did not care for the narrative, I found the story refreshingly subversive for that era, and I applaud Moore and Gibbons for crafting such a unique story. That the characters, themes, and framework of the story are still being explored in movies, tv-series and other graphic novels today show that the story is a classic for a reason. While not a true fan of this tale, I am intrigued enough to explore some more adaptations of the Watchmen universe, and perhaps my feelings will mellow with time and I will come to appreciate how it changed comic book storytelling forever.
-Nancy
April 24, 2020 at 10:19 am
I’ve never cared for Watchmen, either. I can appreciate it as being “refreshingly subversive for that era” as you state, but I have otherwise never been able to really connect with the story. It was a real slog to read and I couldn’t even make it through the movie. Maybe eventually I will give it another try, or maybe not. I dunno. We will see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 24, 2020 at 11:46 am
Its certainly a provocative story. I agree that it was a slog to get thru, that’s why I have put it down several times before, and I needed the animated movie to help me this time around to finish it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 26, 2020 at 7:49 pm
THANK YOU. I think this is a story people just like because they’re “supposed to” like it. I get what they were going for but I can easily think of a dozen stories from various eras (including the ’80s) that do it better. While he does better work in ‘Swamp Thing,’ the way Moore handles his female characters – both here and his brutal fridging of Barbara Gordon in ‘The Killing Joke’ – is disturbingly misogynistic. I think Alan Moore is kind of an @$$ and I don’t much care for his work. In fact, I’ll go so far as to say the Wachowskis’ film adaptation of ‘V for Vendetta’ was better than his comic in every way. ‘Watchmen,’ to me, really gets to the heart of my problem with Alan Moore. If THIS is his greatest work then, yeah, I just don’t think he’s that great. What is there to be impressed by here? Hard pass. I’ve gotten in SOOOOOOO many debates with everyone from students to other patrons in the comic shop. But I will die on this hill. I bet people liked it because it was a “superhero comic” with sex and violence and “adult themes” so they canonized it in a way it never deserved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 27, 2020 at 7:34 am
Misogynistic is the perfect word to describe how the women were portrayed in this book and The Killing Joke! I’m glad you & Jeff didn’t enjoy this book either, for various reasons. While it was certainly groundbreaking for its time, it has not aged well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 16, 2020 at 8:17 pm
I don’t buy into misogynistic especially for The Killing Joke given how there is one woman and she *spoiler alert*just gets shot as a form of attack on her, Jim Gordon and partly Batman*spoiler alert*. As for Watchmen women get treated poorly just as any other characters. I think they’re missing a lot of last minute power plays, but I don’t think Moore cared particularly to make anything that would sideline into these overtly progressive aspirational moments. He had a story in mind and just because women don’t happen to be portrayed as strong, doesn’t mean it’s misogynistic. My complaint is he should’ve given Laurie more time to develop. She never truly stood out like to other guys.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 17, 2020 at 10:04 am
I stand by the term misogynistic. I didn’t think that of Moore when I first read The Killing Joke, but after reading Watchmen, I see a pattern. His female characters are just cannon fodder to be attacked or raped. They serve the male character’s narrative, and are not developed in their own right.
LikeLike
May 18, 2020 at 5:51 pm
Did you have a chance to read V for Vendetta?
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 18, 2020 at 9:12 pm
No, I doubt I will- it doesn’t look appealing to me. What are your thoughts on it?
LikeLike
May 19, 2020 at 1:48 pm
I’ve only seen the movie but was curious to know if you’d read the comic and perhaps share your thoughts on the female characters there and how they compare to the movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 6, 2020 at 11:58 am
You should check out the 1985-86 Squadron Supreme series by Mark Gruenwald. Even though I like Watchmen, I think Squadron Supreme does a far better job at the deconstruction of superheros in a much better story.
LikeLiked by 2 people
May 6, 2020 at 4:20 pm
Thank you for the recommendation- I will look into that series!
LikeLiked by 2 people
May 16, 2020 at 8:08 pm
I had the exact same feelings. I kept putting off because I thought I just had to grow into it or something. After some time I was able to watch the motion comic and appreciate the thing for what it was. And then going back to the comic, although I wasn’t sold on the story and plot, I was able to see what many admired about it. The comic is so pivotal and greatly cosntructed. Top notch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 17, 2020 at 9:57 am
Watchmen was both more than I expected, yet less than I expected. I’m glad I finally read it completely, but I wasn’t a true fan at the end.
LikeLiked by 1 person